Ekaterina Khayrutdinova vs Salma Ewing Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 06:09 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Khayrutdinova vs S. Ewing

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Khayrutdinova 1 - 0 Ewing
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ekaterina Khayrutdinova winning 2 and Salma Ewing winning 0. The last match between Ekaterina Khayrutdinova and Salma Ewing was at the W100 Macon, 14-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Ekaterina Khayrutdinova getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Khayrutdinova | 1 |
| Ewing | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W100 Macon(10-14-25)
E. Khayrutdinova vs S. Ewing H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 73.44% (47-17) | Career Total W/L | 57.61% (106-78) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Khayrutdinova vs S. Ewing Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Salma Ewing has a slight edge over Ekaterina Khayrutdinova, winning 41.19% of second serve points compared to 39.28% for Khayrutdinova. Does this indicate a potential advantage for Ewing? Yes, as there is a strong link between this stat and match success.
- Return Game: Khayrutdinova performs slightly better on second serve returns, securing 51.06% compared to Ewing's 50.43%. Do these small differences matter? Absolutely, as they are key to determining the favored player.
- First Serve Returns: Khayrutdinova outperforms Ewing, winning 35.76% of first serve returns as opposed to Ewing's 32.56%. This factor is crucial in head-to-head matchups. Could this be a decisive advantage? Yes, it highlights Khayrutdinova's strength in return games.
- Pressure Situations: Under pressure, Khayrutdinova has saved slightly more breakpoints at 49.16%, compared to Ewing's 48.37%. Is Khayrutdinova better at handling pressure? The narrow margin suggests minor superiority.
- Overall Performance: Khayrutdinova has a superior win rate over the past year at 75.86%, while Ewing stands at 55.56%. Does this make Khayrutdinova the likely winner overall? Yes, it underscores her consistency and form.
- Surface Suitability: Both players excel on Hard courts with a 59% win rate, but Ewing struggles on indoor Hard surfaces with a 0% win rate. Is surface familiarity critical? Definitely, as it influences player confidence and strategy.
- Player Level: Khayrutdinova has dominated in lower-tier events, winning 84.21% of matches, while Ewing has a 55.26% win rate in slightly higher-level events. Does this highlight a disparity in competition faced? Yes, it shows Khayrutdinova's dominance in her tier.
- Opponent Quality: Ewing competes against higher-quality opponents, with an average rank of 329.31, compared to Khayrutdinova's 596.9. Does this experience against tougher opponents help Ewing? Potentially, as it might prepare her better for challenging matches.
- Deciding Sets: In deciding sets, Khayrutdinova wins 67% of matches compared to Ewing's 46%. Is Khayrutdinova better in decisive moments? Yes, she has a clear edge in handling crucial set-match scenarios.
- Current Form: Performance in the current event should also be reviewed, as players may excel under certain tournament conditions. Could current form sway the outcome? It can, if historical data is balanced by strong current displays.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Salma Ewing and Ekaterina Khayrutdinova presents a fascinating contest between different strengths and recent performances. While Ewing has shown some resilience in handling tougher opponents and a slightly better second serve, Khayrutdinova's superior return game, ability to hold under pressure, and strong deciding set performance are notable advantages.
Moreover, Khayrutdinova's impressive win rate over the past year and dominance in her performance tier suggest she enters this match with considerable confidence. Her capacity to handle first serve returns more effectively and her overall consistency across competitions make her the marginal favorite.
Taking into account all performance indicators, strengths, and the quality of opponents faced, Ekaterina Khayrutdinova emerges as the most likely winner in this match-up.
Ekaterina Khayrutdinova vs Salma Ewing Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Khayrutdinova vs S. Ewing H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:25:16 | Average Match Time | 1:25:16 |
| 59% (29/49) | 1st Serve % | 40% (21/52) |
| 72% (21/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (12/21) |
| 70% (14/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (10/31) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 58% (30/52) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Khayrutdinova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
F | L | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
S. Ewing Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||

E. Khayrutdinova vs S. Ewing Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.44% (47/17) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.61% (106/78) |
| 68.71% (101/46) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.67% (242/185) |
| 58.15% (778/560) | Games Win/Loss | 53.83% (2086/1789) |
| 79.31% (46/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.03% (85/59) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (21/18) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 78 | Aces Total | 203 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 225 | Total Double Faults | 422 |
| 1:32:26 | Average Match Time | 1:7:33 |
| 500.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.1 |
| 69% (2646/3847) | 1st Serve % | 57% (4203/7342) |
| 62% (1647/2646) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2628/4203) |
| 48% (571/1201) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1437/3139) |
| 49% (287/587) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (450/940) |
| 49% (1909/3896) | Return Points Win % | 47% (3351/7183) |
| 70.37% (19/8) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (50/50) |
| 75.68% (28/9) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (56/28) |
| 73% (47/64) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (106/181) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 36% (5/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 26% (8/31) |
| 63% (12/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (30/58) |
| 90% (41/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (114/93) |
| 10% (41/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (114/21) |
| 43% (23/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (70/13) |